Current:Home > ScamsSurpassing Quant Think Tank Center|Arizona Senate advances proposed ballot measure to let local police make border-crossing arrests -Excel Wealth Summit
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center|Arizona Senate advances proposed ballot measure to let local police make border-crossing arrests
Indexbit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 06:55:11
PHOENIX (AP) — The Surpassing Quant Think Tank CenterArizona Senate approved a proposed ballot measure that would ask voters in November to make it a state crime for noncitizens to enter the state through Mexico at any location other than a port of entry.
The proposal approved Wednesday on a 16-13 party-line vote would draw Arizona directly into immigration enforcement by letting state and local police arrest people crossing the border without authorization and giving state judges the power to order people convicted of the offense to return to their country of origin. The measure, similar to a Texas law that has been put on hold by a federal appeals court while it is being challenged, now advances to the Republican-controlled Arizona House. If approved by the full Legislature, the measure would bypass Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar proposal two months ago, and instead would be sent to the Nov. 5 ballot for voters to decide.
Before the vote was taken, a handful of immigrant rights supporters yelled, “Stop the hate, stop the hate,” interrupting the debate and profanely calling supporters of the measure racists before the advocates walked out of the chamber.
While federal law already prohibits the unauthorized entry of migrants into the U.S., proponents say the measure is needed because the federal government hasn’t done enough to stop people from crossing illegally over Arizona’s porous border with Mexico. They also said some people who enter Arizona without authorization commit identity theft and take advantage of public benefits.
“We are being invaded,” said Republican Jake Hoffman of Queen Creek. Opponents say the proposal would hurt Arizona’s reputation in the business world, carry huge unfunded costs for law enforcement agencies that don’t have experience in enforcing immigration law, and lead to racial profiling of immigrants, legal residents and U.S. citizens.
“This bill is going to create all sorts of chaos,” said Democratic Sen. Catherine Miranda of Phoenix. Under the proposal, a first-time conviction of the border-crossing provision would be a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, and state judges could order people to return to their country of origin after completing a term of incarceration, though they also would have the power to dismiss a pending charge if the person agrees to return to their home country.
Last week, the proposal stalled over an exception to the illegal crossing provision for recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a federal program that shields thousands of young people from deportation.
Under an earlier version of the proposal, DACA recipients would have been subject to prosecution if those protections from deportation were to be cancelled or a court deemed them unlawful, raising objections from a key Republican lawmaker who said the recipients shouldn’t face such legal jeopardy.
On Wednesday, the provision dealing with DACA recipients was cut altogether from the proposal. Republican Sen. Ken Bennett of Prescott, who voted for the measure after insisting that the DACA provision be removed, said language also was added to clarify that the law doesn’t apply to people who illegally entered Arizona before enforcement starts on the proposed ballot measure.
“I know this is not perfect, but this is a vast improvement of where it was a week ago,” Bennett said.
Supporters of the proposed ballot measure waved off concerns about racial profiling, saying local officers would still have to develop probable cause to arrest people who enter the country in between the ports of entry.
The backers also say the proposal is focused on only the state’s border region and -- unlike Arizona’s landmark 2010 immigration law -- doesn’t target people throughout the state. Opponents point out the proposal doesn’t contain any geographical limitations on where it can be enforced. After the Senate approved the measure, Hobbs issued a statement denouncing the proposal. “Business leaders, border law enforcement, and bipartisan local leaders throughout the state who oppose this bill know it will not make us safer, instead it will demonize our communities and lead to racial profiling,” Hobbs said.
The ballot proposal contains other proposal provisions that aren’t included in the Texas measure, such as making it a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death. This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migrants who aren’t authorized to be in the United States.
When passing its landmark 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they are believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics, but courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Kentucky GOP moves to criminalize interference with legislature after transgender protests
- Pioneer Woman Ree Drummond Denies Using Ozempic Amid Weight Loss Transformation
- Odell Beckham Jr. landing spots: Bills and other teams that could use former Ravens WR
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- 'Significant injuries' reported in Indiana amid tornado outbreak, police can't confirm deaths
- Brittany Cartwright Reveals How Getting Facial Liposuction Negatively Affected Her Appearance
- South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem faces lawsuit after viral endorsement of Texas dentists
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Ohio’s presidential and state primaries
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- From 'Poor Things' to 'Damsel,' here are 15 movies you need to stream right now
- Tornadoes have left a trail of destruction in the central US. At least 3 are dead in Ohio
- The Best Wedding Gift Ideas for Newlyweds Who Are Just Moving in Together
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- North Korea says Kim Jong Un test drove a new tank, urged troops to complete preparations for war
- SpaceX's Starship lost, but successful in third test: Here's what happened in past launches
- Jax Taylor Addresses Cheating Rumors and Reveals the Real Reason for Brittany Cartwright Breakup
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
Save Up to 60% Off on Barefoot Dreams Loungewear & Experience Cozy Like Never Before
From 'Poor Things' to 'Damsel,' here are 15 movies you need to stream right now
AP Decision Notes: What to expect in the Tuesday presidential and state primaries
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Millions blocked from porn sites as free speech, child safety debate rages across US
Mississippi ballot initiative process faces narrowing path to being restored
Save Up to 60% Off on Barefoot Dreams Loungewear & Experience Cozy Like Never Before