Current:Home > reviewsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -Excel Wealth Summit
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-13 01:31:38
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (11)
Related
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- North Dakota, Using Taxpayer Funds, Bailed Out Oil and Gas Companies by Plugging Abandoned Wells
- California Proposal Embraces All-Electric Buildings But Stops Short of Gas Ban
- Mark Zuckerberg Accepts Elon Musk’s Challenge to a Cage Fight
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Tomato shortages hit British stores. Is Brexit to blame?
- Black married couples face heavier tax penalties than white couples, a report says
- Inside Clean Energy: Here Are 3 States to Watch in 2021
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Beyoncé's Adidas x Ivy Park Drops a Disco-Inspired Swim Collection To Kick off the Summer
Ranking
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- OceanGate Believes All 5 People On Board Missing Titanic Sub Have Sadly Died
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 16, 2023
- Eli Lilly cuts the price of insulin, capping drug at $35 per month out-of-pocket
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- In a New Policy Statement, the Nation’s Physicists Toughen Their Stance on Climate Change, Stressing Its Reality and Urgency
- Alyson Stoner Says They Were Fired from Children’s Show After Coming Out as Queer
- With the World Focused on Reducing Methane Emissions, Even Texas Signals a Crackdown on ‘Flaring’
Recommendation
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Inside Clean Energy: The Energy Storage Boom Has Arrived
More than 2 million Cosori air fryers have been recalled over fire risks
Black married couples face heavier tax penalties than white couples, a report says
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
How to file your tax returns: 6 things you should know this year
Warming Trends: The BBC Introduces ‘Life at 50 Degrees,’ Helping African Farmers Resist Drought and Driftwood Provides Clues to Climate’s Past
At least 3 dead in Pennsylvania flash flooding